Friday, May 28, 2010

"Does That Flag Still Wave...?"

On this Memorial Day weekend, we will remember family and friends who have passed away, spend time with those whom we love, have a barbecue, and hopefully have a great time.

Ronald Reagan, capably, reminded the world why we celebrate Memorial Day in his comments at Arlington National Cemetery, May 31, 1982.

He ended his comments by noting that our National Anthem ends with a question: "Oh say does that flag still wave o're the land of the free and the home of the brave?"

Concluding, the President said, "That is what we must all ask."
__________

Remarks at Memorial Day Ceremonies at Arlington National Cemetery
May 31, 1982

Mr. President, General, the distinguished guests here with us today, my fellow citizens:

In America's cities and towns today, flags will be placed on graves in cemeteries; public officials will speak of the sacrifice and the valor of those whose memory we honor.

In 1863, when he dedicated a small cemetery in Pennsylvania marking a terrible collision between the armies of North and South, Abraham Lincoln noted the swift obscurity of such speeches. Well, we know now that Lincoln was wrong about that particular occasion. His remarks commemorating those who gave their ``last full measure of devotion'' were long remembered. But since that moment at Gettysburg, few other such addresses have become part of our national heritage -- not because of the inadequacy of the speakers, but because of the inadequacy of words.

I have no illusions about what little I can add now to the silent testimony of those who gave their lives willingly for their country. Words are even more feeble on this Memorial Day, for the sight before us is that of a strong and good nation that stands in silence and remembers those who were loved and who, in return, loved their countrymen enough to die for them.

Yet, we must try to honor them -- not for their sakes alone, but for our own. And if words cannot repay the debt we owe these men, surely with our actions we must strive to keep faith with them and with the vision that led them to battle and to final sacrifice.

Our first obligation to them and ourselves is plain enough: The United States and the freedom for which it stands, the freedom for which they died, must endure and prosper. Their lives remind us that freedom is not bought cheaply. It has a cost; it imposes a burden. And just as they whom we commemorate were willing to sacrifice, so too must we -- in a less final, less heroic way -- be willing to give of ourselves.

It is this, beyond the controversy and the congressional debate, beyond the blizzard of budget numbers and the complexity of modern weapons systems, that motivates us in our search for security and peace. War will not come again, other young men will not have to die, if we will speak honestly of the dangers that confront us and remain strong enough to meet those dangers.

It's not just strength or courage that we need, but understanding and a measure of wisdom as well. We must understand enough about our world to see the value of our alliances. We must be wise enough about ourselves to listen to our allies, to work with them, to build and strengthen the bonds between us.

Our understanding must also extend to potential adversaries. We must strive to speak of them not belligerently, but firmly and frankly. And that's why we must never fail to note, as frequently as necessary, the wide gulf between our codes of morality. And that's why we must never hesitate to acknowledge the irrefutable difference between our view of man as master of the state and their view of man as servant of the state. Nor must we ever underestimate the seriousness of their aspirations to global expansion. The risk is the very freedom that has been so dearly won.

It is this honesty of mind that can open paths to peace, that can lead to fruitful negotiation, that can build a foundation upon which treaties between our nations can stand and last -- treaties that can someday bring about a reduction in the terrible arms of destruction, arms that threaten us with war even more terrible than those that have taken the lives of the Americans we honor today.

In the quest for peace, the United States has proposed to the Soviet Union that we reduce the threat of nuclear weapons by negotiating a stable balance at far lower levels of strategic forces. This is a fitting occasion to announce that START, as we call it, strategic arms reductions, that the negotiations between our country and the Soviet Union will begin on the 29th of June.

As for existing strategic arms agreements, we will refrain from actions which undercut them so long as the Soviet Union shows equal restraint. With good will and dedication on both sides, I pray that we will achieve a safer world.

Our goal is peace. We can gain that peace by strengthening our alliances, by speaking candidly of the dangers before us, by assuring potential adversaries of our seriousness, by actively pursuing every chance of honest and fruitful negotiation.

It is with these goals in mind that I will depart Wednesday for Europe, and it's altogether fitting that we have this moment to reflect on the price of freedom and those who have so willingly paid it. For however important the matters of state before us this next week, they must not disturb the solemnity of this occasion. Nor must they dilute our sense of reverence and the silent gratitude we hold for those who are buried here.

The willingness of some to give their lives so that others might live never fails to evoke in us a sense of wonder and mystery. One gets that feeling here on this hallowed ground, and I have known that same poignant feeling as I looked out across the rows of white crosses and Stars of David in Europe, in the Philippines, and the military cemeteries here in our own land. Each one marks the resting place of an American hero and, in my lifetime, the heroes of World War I, the Doughboys, the GI's of World War II or Korea or Vietnam. They span several generations of young Americans, all different and yet all alike, like the markers above their resting places, all alike in a truly meaningful way.

Winston Churchill said of those he knew in World War II they seemed to be the only young men who could laugh and fight at the same time. A great general in that war called them our secret weapon, ``just the best darn kids in the world.'' Each died for a cause he considered more important than his own life. Well, they didn't volunteer to die; they volunteered to defend values for which men have always been willing to die if need be, the values which make up what we call civilization. And how they must have wished, in all the ugliness that war brings, that no other generation of young men to follow would have to undergo that same experience.

As we honor their memory today, let us pledge that their lives, their sacrifices, their valor shall be justified and remembered for as long as God gives life to this nation. And let us also pledge to do our utmost to carry out what must have been their wish: that no other generation of young men will every have to share their experiences and repeat their sacrifice.

Earlier today, with the music that we have heard and that of our National Anthem -- I can't claim to know the words of all the national anthems in the world, but I don't know of any other that ends with a question and a challenge as ours does: Does that flag still wave o'er the land of the free and the home of the brave? That is what we must all ask.

Thank you.

5 comments:

  1. For those of you who are homosexual and have served in our armed forces, I say "Thank you for your service."

    It is my hope and sincere desire that in the future our armed forces will not allow homosexuals to serve there.

    My values are different than many of those who are in public office
    and make decisions that affect this nation that I also served to defend against all enemies.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anon 10:58

    As a gay man I say that if (big if) your world comes true where openly gay people cannot serve in the military than (1) thank you every straight person who then serves in the military for protecting me and my american rights (and all my gay friends') without me (us) having to risk my own neck (our own necks) to do it and (2) if a draft were ever created again for making me (and my friends) exempt from such a requirement.

    God bless you for your selflessness in this hypothetical world. You could/would truly be making the ultimate sacrifice to protect every gay individual in America. Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  3. I do Not use the "Revisionist Terminology"-But "Biblical Terminology" as a Christian Veteran.-Therefore,I am Opposed to "Sodomites" in our Society or the Bogus, Unconstitutional Sexual Orientation Laws passed by Judges Legislating Statuatory Laws from the Bench,-Instead of the Common Laws Passed by We the People On Issues.-and Giving them "Rights" , when in Context, They are calling the Word of God a Lie-and Making America an "Abomination Before God"--In Context, when the Muslims call Us -"Infidels"- They are Sadly Correct Nowdays, with the Exception of about 1 % of the 3,000 Different Religions in America Today--Most with "PERVERTED BIBLES OR TEXTBOOKS & MUSIC PRODUCTIONS"---"-WE NEED TO HAVE A 3RD GREAT AWAKENING IN AMERICA".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Glen and 1058

    Good grief . We are talking about human beings here . If you want people in the military that live up to Bibical Law expect to have a small military , as far as I know it would be Christ only living up to that expectation . And He might avoid serving being a conscientious objector. We have not always been right in our wars you know.

    This kind of hatred towards homosexuals is what hurts this debate , in fact such comments have caused Christians more problems based on this . The Bible teaches us we will receive trouble from the world for serving our Lord, many mistake negative reactions to the hateful comments here as based on that teaching .

    You are wrong . The Pharisees used the Law based on their own pride to keep the people under their power. How dare you use the lives of homosexuals as a basis for spouting your self righteousness.

    You think a person who is gay is more guilty then a hetrosexual living with a person out of marriage . Or as the example Jesus gave any one of us who sees another person who is attractive and we lust ?

    Of course their are issues Christians need to speak to . One is living together in hetrosexual relations is not considered a special class to be defended . Well I take that back , laws were changed to protect those housing in homes not to be discriminated against based on marriage . Or non marriage . That is when Christians should have gotten involved in my opinion . We slept at the switch , most likely because so many of us were getting divorced or living with others that we overlooked our sins and attacked others for the ones we really don't like .

    Open Gays in the military obviously will happen.
    Big deal.

    I believe it is more important to be concerned about helping the poor, and Loving God. If you ask me if we were better at that this gays in the military issue would never have happened.
    Homosexuals can love and come to Christ as their Savior . Perhaps they might have a walk that does not resemble ours , but does not Paul teach us about how the mature Christian should behave around the new one. Do all people who receive redemmption become Lights of Christian Service right away .
    Are we not taught to love one another . Is the Gospel so weak it can not be extended to the people you have problems with .

    ReplyDelete
  5. Glen, it sounds like you might have missed it, but the recent civil rights law for gays in Washington was passed by 'we the people' in an actual election.

    ReplyDelete

Faith & Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.