Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Poisonous Politics

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF
After suggesting that our country had a moral problem due to the abandonment of Judeo-Christian principles in our culture and that the tragedy in Tucson was possibly related to moral failure, not politics, I have experienced the full force of expressed hatred from those who do not agree, much of which cannot be published.

Patrick Buchanan has written a column that I believe cuts to the heart of the matter:

Pat Buchanan: Poisonous Politics
By Patrick J. Buchanan

On Feb. 15, 1933, Giuseppe Zangara, delusional and a loner, fired his .32-caliber pistol at FDR in the Bayfront Park area of Miami.

Five feet tall, Zangara could not aim over the crowd. So, he stood on a folding chair and was piled on after the first of five shots. He wounded four people, including Mayor Anton Cermak of Chicago.

In two weeks, Zangara, who pled guilty, had been sentenced to 80 years. When Cermak died on March 6, Zangara was retried for murder and sentenced to the electric chair, where he died on March 20, 1933.

In that time, if you knew what you were doing, knew the penalty for it and then committed the crime, you paid the price -- and swiftly. There was no wailing that Zangara, a misfit suffering from a stomach ailment, was not fully responsible.

There was no campaign to accuse Republicans, after a rough election, of creating an atmosphere in which a deranged mind may have been driven to try to kill FDR. That came three decades later, when conservatives were charged with having "created the atmosphere" in which JFK was assassinated.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a communist who had defected to Russia and a member of the pro-Castro Fair Play for Cuba Committee, who had only recently arrived in Texas. Yet moral culpability for what he did was laid at the door of the city of Dallas and the rising American Right.
Had not, the press asked, Adlai Stevenson been lately jostled by a crowd in Dallas? Had not LBJ and Lady Bird been verbally abused in the lobby of a Dallas hotel in 1960? Was Dallas not a hothouse of the right?

The same smear tactic was employed when Timothy McVeigh blew up the Murrah building in Oklahoma City, killing 168, among them 19 children. Right-wing radio and its anti-government rhetoric, it was said, created the atmosphere that made it easier for McVeigh to feel justified in blowing up a federal building.

Saturday, even before Jared Loughner had been charged with murdering six people in Tucson, including a 9-year-old girl and a U.S. judge, and wounding 13 in an assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, the old smear machine had been wheeled out.

Giffords, it was said, had been "targeted" by Sarah Palin for defeat in ads depicting her district in cross hairs. And had not Palin used the expression, "Don't retreat, reload!"? Had not Sharron Angle in Nevada talked of "Second Amendment remedies"? Had not talk-show hosts on Fox News used incendiary language that can drive weak and deranged minds over the line?

Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, a Democrat and friend of Giffords, kicked off the campaign Saturday with this excoriation.

"I'd just like to say that when you look at unbalanced people, how they are -- how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths, about tearing down the government, the anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous."

Dupnik later narrowed it to some "people in the radio business and some people in the TV business." Democratic Rep. Bill Pascrell narrowed it further to Fox News, the home of Glenn Beck.

Elements on the left are now connecting the dots -- the words of Palin and Fox News -- to the deeds of accused mass murderer Jared Loughner.

This is not political hardball. This is political dirt ball.

Do any such dots exist in reality? Or only in the embittered minds and malevolent motives of those unreconciled to the defeat they suffered on Nov. 2?

Undeniably, political rhetoric is hotter than it has been since the 1960s and ought to be dialed down. But Barack Obama, talking tough in 2008 about how he would deal with Republican attacks, himself said, "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun. ... Folks in Philly like a good brawl."

In 2010, Obama called on Hispanics to join him and "punish our enemies." Harry Reid in 2009 called Tea Party critics "evil-mongers" who disrupt town-hall meetings with "lies, innuendo and rumors."

It is easy for journalists to imply or impute a causal connection between hot words and horrible acts. Simply twin the two in a story, or ask an interviewee if he thinks these words and those deeds are not connected. And then let the public imagination do the rest.

As of today, there is not a shred of evidence of any connection between what Sarah Palin or Fox News said and what Jared Loughner did. From the evidence, Loughner had his first and perhaps his only encounter with Giffords in 2007, a year before Palin ever came to national attention as the running mate of John McCain.

The man charged with this awful atrocity is Jared Loughner.

Our country would be better served if, instead of accusing each other of moral culpability for these crimes, politicians and media joined to demand that Loughner be denied the fame (or infamy) he sought, and that he receive the same swift justice as Giuseppe Zangara.


  1. Thank you for standing up for our freedom of speech, the rights that our forefathers were willing to die for.

  2. Jared Loughner is totally responsible for his actions. He made the choice to pull the trigger. He killed six people. It was not his gun, not Sarah Palin, not anyone but himself. People/Society refuse to be responsible and accountable for their actions anymore and want to blame everyone and everything else for their poor/wrong choices and decisions. Yes, we have lost site of the morality and accountability of the Founders and our Judeo-Christian principles. "Thous shalt not murder".

    Loughner was caught 'red-handed' and justice should be treated the same way as it was with Giuseppe Zangara; swiftly and not at a long, drawn-out prison sentence at the taxpayers expense. As the old saying goes, "ya plays the game, ya pays the price".

  3. Thanks for the excellent article. Justice should be swift. Since all this vitriol comes majorly from the Left, they must be terribly afraid of Sarah Palin. Rightfully so. Except for her unfortunate association with McCain (who is also a Leftist), she will make a great president, should she continue to openly convey and live the Christian values she said she espouses. (And if she dumps McCain!)

  4. Yup, the guy is crazy. It doesn't matter if he's left or right. Why not just say, hey, there are crazy people out there who will take things over the top. So let's just be thoughtful about what we plant in their brain.

    Let's stop talking about settling political differences with guns, bullets, violence, or by watering the tree of liberty with blood. Let's stop encouraging people to bring their guns to rallies.

    We have legitimate political differences and that is healthy for democracy. Let's debate them in civilized and respectful manner.

    Gary, as a man of Christ, I suggest that you should lead the way and discourage violent rhetoric.

  5. Funny how Gary's first response was a post labelling DailyKos posters as hate-monger's responsible for the toxic atmosphere. He then sought to make political hay out of the shooting for his pet political aims, even though they are completely unrelated. Sorry, but this "Oh, how dare anyone politicize this" shtick is more than a day late and a dollar short.


Faith and Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.