Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Hearings, Votes And Confessions

It was great to see so many of you at the marriage hearings yesterday in Olympia. Thank you for coming. Senator Dan Swecker told me that although the testimonies were very well presented, and they were, the numbers of people attending the hearings is even a stronger voice. The hearing room was filled with several other overflow rooms filled as well. The majority of those attending were people who support and defend marriage.

While good people testified in regard to their deeply held feelings and beliefs about marriage and their concerns about the marriage bill, another well timed, choreographed drama entered stage left.

Immediately following the hearings, Senator Mary Margararet Haugen, D-Camano Island called a press conference to announce that she had decided to vote for redefining marriage.

Sen. Haugen told the press she had taken time to "sort out for myself, to reconcile my religious beliefs as an American, as a Legislator, and as a wife and mother who cannot deny others the joys and benefits I enjoy." She confessed it had taken her a long time to get to the point of supporting the effort to redefine marriage.

In pledging her vote for homosexual "marriage," she became the 25th vote, becoming the deciding vote for the Senate to pass the bill probably sometime next week.

I'm wondering how Sen. Haugen will deal with other special interest groups who will now also demand marriage? What about polygamists and other groupings of people who also claim to be in love and have long term relationships? Will she discriminate against them and deny them the "joys and benefits" she enjoys?

Haugen said she voted in favor of homosexual "marriage" because of her Christian faith. She also said she would prefer that this issue be referred to the people for a vote, but didn't think the legislature would approve referring it to the people.

We'll see.

Here's the next step.

When this bill comes to the floor, there will be an amendment introduced by a senator to refer the matter to the voters. A number of legislators have said they would prefer to see this happen. Will they cave in to Gov. Gregoire, Sen. Ed Murray, Rep. Jamie Pedersen and others who are pressuring lawmakers not to send it to the people?

If the Legislature refuses to refer this issue to the people, then we will begin a referendum or initiative.

I cannot overstate the importance of your support at this time.

This is likely the most defining moral and cultural decision ever made by the Washington State Legislature. The next generation will be left to explain and endure the consequences of this decision should it be allowed to stand.

Just as Sen. Murray has incrementally laid the groundwork over the past 20 years, proclaiming his bills to be about fairness and tolerance, not about redefining marriage, he and others have also laid the groundwork to fundamentally transform what your child will be taught in public school regarding sexuality, homosexuality, family, gender, mother-father relationships and human relationships. Your child will be taught, under the guise of "bullying" education, that homosexual behavior is normal and those who do not affirm it are bigots and intolerant.

This prize piece of the homosexual agenda for the state will advance the "questioning" aspect of the LGBTQ agenda. This is a morally devastating decision, with reprehensive consequences.

Again, I cannot overstate the importance of your support at this time. We will do everything we can do with God's help and your support because I believe we are called to stand against the moral decline in the culture and for righteousness. And together we must seek God's blessing and favor. This is not a political battle. It is a spiritual one.

Thank you for standing with us.

Be Vigilant. Be Discerning. Be Prayerful. Be Active.

4 comments:

  1. Seivaddub@aol.com3:20 PM, January 24, 2012

    Maybe we are on the defense because we have no offense or counter proposal. Presuming that that homosexuals have the legal right to join in "secular union", what would be the right word to use to express what "marriage" expresses for heterosexual couples? Monage, Pairage? If we offered a good alternative to "marriage" would that help?

    ReplyDelete
  2. What? Allow the ignorant neanderthals that make up the majority to have a say? Never!

    Their innate superiority ensures that the Pervo-American community will do what's best for Washington. Learn to obey, breeders!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kudos to all who showed their support for what marriage was designed to be. 1 man + 1 women for life.

    The homosexual community knows they can't win a public vote on this issue, only by legislative fiat is it possible. If it passes, please send me lots of referendum sheets to be signed by people with some common sense morals.

    Craig in Lacey

    ReplyDelete
  4. It appears that WA conservatives have lost faith in Gary Randall. Why else would Ken Hutcherson be leading the fight on this and not Gary?

    BTW, Gary if marriage equality causes schools to teach that homosexual behavior is good, then why haven't any schools in the 15 states with gay marriage or civil unions done that? There should be hundreds of thousands of irate parents out there by now. But all you ever hear about are 2 families who got into a dispute 6 years ago over 2 books selected by a single principal. Nothing has happened with them or anyone else in any other school in MA since. Some consequences.

    ReplyDelete

Faith & Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.