Thursday, January 26, 2012

The Problem With The Secular Progressive Movement

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF
While hailing the fact that they are making "progress," the Progressive Movement is often progressing in the wrong direction. A direction that most often diminishes the sanctity of life, family, marriage, human dignity, personal freedoms and even national fiscal solvency.

Activists in Washington State are hailing "progress" as they move closer to redefining marriage. And they are making "progress."

But is "progress" always good?

Let's take a quick look at the Progressive Movement and review where it has taken us.

Many point to H.G. Wells as the father of the modern progressive movement in America.

A devotee of Darwinism, his primary mission was to, "reassign human beings from the spiritual to the natural world." He said, "People of quality must be ascendant, not democratic---Idiots, drunkards, criminals, lunatics, invalids and diseased will spoil the world for others."

John Dewey was the most influential so-called "progressive reformer" of public education since its thriving launch by Noah Webster. Dewey's 20th Century assault on public education, inserted his own atheism, hi-jacking education as Webster had envisioned it, transforming it into a petri dish for social experimentation. Dewey replaced Webster's time honored, biblical principles that had caused America to lead the world in education with secular progressivism---no absolutes---no consistent right or wrong---no accountability and no higher authority than one's own beliefs at any given time. No absolute truth.

Today America is not even close to leading in education.

And the progressives called that "progress."

Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood was another prominent progressive.

Her personal legacy includes statements such as, "More children from the fit---less from the unfit---that is the chief aim of birth control."

On the extermination of Blacks she said, "We do not want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population if it even occurs to any of the more rebellious members."

The goal of eugenicists? "To prevent the multiplication of bad stocks," (Dr. Ernst Rudin, April 1933, Birth Control Review) Sanger was the editor.

The result of Sanger's activism? Planned Parenthood with abortion centers in primarily poor Black neighborhoods. Centers that are heavily funded with taxpayer dollars. An organization that leads the abortion business, which has killed over 50 million babies in the name of "choice."

And the progressives called that "progress."

The more recent champion of the Progressive Movement was Saul Alinsky, the father of what is called community organizing.

Alinsky made many bold and radical statements, probably the best known and often quoted was, "Lest we forget, at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical: from our legends, mythology, and history; the very first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he got his own kingdom---Lucifer."

Another Alinsky statement: "Taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so fruitless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future."

This and his other teaching has given us ACORN and a President who is terribly out of touch with what America is really about.

And the progressives call it progress.

Aldous Huxley saw the end of so-called secular progressive pathways. In 1932 he wrote in his famous Brave New World, "All members of society are conditioned in childhood to hold the values that the World State idealizes."

In 1949 he wrote that if progressives prevail, sometime in the future, "I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and naro-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government than clubs and prisons..."

This defines the modern day secular progressive movement and their co-opting of traditional values and absolute Truth.

Gov. Gregoire has admitted she was personally and spiritually conflicted about her support for redefining marriage. Other Legislators have also admitted personal conflict, but have now come out in support of homosexual marriage in the name of social "progress." Their desire to create "progress" has caused them to turn from their church and the biblical teaching of their youth. And their own conscience.

Think about this: C.S. Lewis said, "We all want progress, but if you're on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive."

We are on the wrong road toward redefining marriage.

The ancient prophet Jeremiah told the people, "This is what the Lord says: ask where the good way is, and walk in it, and you will find rest for your souls. But you said, 'We will not walk in it' I appointed watchmen over you and said, 'Listen to the sound of the trumpet' But you said, 'We will not listen'...disaster came because they did not listen to the ancient words of wisdom and they rejected His law." Jeremiah 6: 16-19.

Be Vigilant. Be Discerning. Be Prayerful.


  1. Yes, Lucifer does have a kingdom and those who reject God's guidance will continue to live in it. There is hope, " the kingdoms of this world have become the kingdoms of God and of His Christ", soon I think.

    Craig in Lacey

  2. I'm just curious. If Newt gets the nomination, are you going to change your slogan to "1 Main + 3 Wives = Marriage"? Go Sanctity!

  3. This is an outstanding article Gary. I'm going to share it from my pulpit this Sunday. Keep up the good work. May God bless and keep you.

  4. Please forward this to all on your list. Every Christian needs to read this. God's blessing on you Gary.

  5. I'm struck by the silence of Gary's detractors. I guess this information is hard to defend or blame Gary for.

  6. 3:51

    Seriously, there's nothing to respond to. This post is just stupid, and I very seldom use that word.

    No reasonable person believes that planned parenthood is about eugenics. This article is just red meat for Gary's devout followers, but inconsequential for everyone else.

    Mark in Tigard

    1. Mark,
      Sorry, but I just can't help but giggle. I suppose that isn't very polite but man, when you are wrong you're wrong. Poor guy.

  7. No the note just says nothing, so there is nothing to respond to.

  8. Gary,
    Thank you for laying this summary of 100 years of attacking the foundations of the United States. As you know, I've been encouraging folks to read "None Dare Call It Treason" as another well documented summary of what has been happening to our Republic. As I've studied history and church history in America, much of our decline into the mesmerizing of progressivism came in about 1880.

    I really, no matter what some think of Charles Finney, that he hit the nail on the head when he pointed out that the press, cultural, political and spiritual woes, degradation, of the US was at the feet of the pulpit.

    It is more than time we see a Reformation to the core truths of the Gospel in the churches. This is a return to the morality that was Foundational in this nation. John Adams and others clearly noted that "this Constitution is only for a moral and virtuous people." What will it take for the priest, pastors and rabi's to return to Lead and teach morality as what established our Republic?

    The enemy has used his minions to execute well his plan through progressivism, known as Fabianism, that is pervasive in every aspect of our society and protracted by the elected which we have allowed to usurp our principles. To counter this, the Body must reform itself according to the full essence of Gods Word and then Act in real Faith accordingly. If we believe then we must act otherwise, what is our Faith?

    Thank you for being the stalwart that you are and revealing truth for what it is!

  9. Liberalism at one time had more in common with the human dignity and respect for the individual . It has become a Rachael Meadow talking point .

  10. Excellent excellent summary. Great comments too. I repeat one of the posts re: not much from Gary's distractors. When one is staring truth in the face it is pretty hard to combat.

    But of course Mark makes a futile one believes PP is about eugenics? Humph. No it is just about killing babies and especially those in poor neighborhoods. Period.

    1. For point of accuracy, I said that no 'reasonable person' would believe it. I'm certain it's a common belief in the hard core evangelical world.

      Mark in Tigard

    2. It's an actual fact in the everyday world.

      Craig in Lacey


Faith and Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.