Thursday, March 27, 2014

World Vision Reverses Position on Homosexuality

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF
A statement released by World Vision president Richard Stearns earlier this week caught my attention.

He said, "World Vision will no longer require its more than 1100 employees to restrict their sexual activity to marriage between one man and one woman if they are in a legal same-sex marriage."

Stearns explained this "very narrow policy change is simply a decision about whether or not you are eligible for employment at World Vision US, based on this single issue, and nothing more..."

He said this is not an "endorsement," we are not on a "slippery slope," we are not "caving to pressure" and we are not "compromising."

But they were doing all of those things.

He said we are "deferring to the authority of churches and denominations on theological issues."

He explained that there are many differences within churches such as method of baptism, communion sacraments, etc., and World Vision does not want to jump into the divisive issue of homosexuality.

I was profoundly concerned and disappointed both personally and spiritually.

I am fully aware that World Vision employs many in the Seattle area, many of whom read this column regularly. I am also aware that World Vision takes in over a billion dollars a year and helps many poor and needy around the world. I have personally seen their work.

I also knew the founder of World Vision, Bob Pierce. I know World Vision was born out of compassion for the needy and a passion to share the gospel and advance biblical teaching. Bob understood that to truly help the suffering, one must also have compassion for eternal suffering, and must preach the gospel and teach biblical Truth.

Bob began his ministry with Youth for Christ and the passion to reach people with the gospel was deeply embedded in the founding of World Vision.

I know that Bob's passion and compassion unfortunately blinded him to the needs of his family, taking him from them for long periods of time. And it happened too often.

His daughter, Marilee, has shared that story with me personally in a television interview.

This "very narrow policy change" that World Vision had announced earlier this week, was indeed an endorsement and it was an endorsement of something that is tearing at the fabric of our culture and the Christian churches around the world.

And it stood in defiance of God's Word.

Neutrality is not an option on moral issues and biblical Truth.


John Piper is one of the most trusted and brilliant evangelical theologians of our time. This caught his attention as well and he has addressed it directly. He reminded us of the words of J I Packer, another trusted evangelical theologian.

World Vision announced late yesterday afternoon they are reversing their decision.


All who knew Bob Pierce, knew of his compassion. They also know that the authority of the Bible was an integral part of the founding of World Vision.

In fact, when Bob was removed from World Vision leadership, he started Samaritan's Purse. He asked a young Franklin Graham to join him and eventually take over the ministry.

Pierce worked with Billy Graham and Dick Ross to produce some of the most powerful and compelling Christian films of their times. As a young man I saw first hand what they were doing in Billy Graham's World Wide Studios in Burbank.

World Vision was birthed in biblical compassion and scriptural integrity.

This is why World Vision's announcement to not allow adultery, but allow homosexual relations among employees was stunning to many of us.

Late yesterday afternoon, World Vision reversed their decision. This is part of their statement:

"Today, the World Vision U.S. board publicly reversed its recent decision to change our national employment conduct policy," The board acknowledged they made a mistake and chose to revert to our longstanding conduct policy requiring sexual abstinence for all single employees and faithfulness within the Biblical covenant of marriage between a man and a woman."

This is a link to more on the story from the Christian Post.

Tuesday, John Piper had published very pointed remarks which were directed to World Vision, with an appeal to "repent" of their decision and reverse it. They have now done just that.

This is also a learning moment for all biblical Christians. Below is Piper's message to World Vision and I believe to all of us.

World Vision: Adultery No, Homosexual Practice Yes
Published 3-25-14 by John Piper.

Christianity Today reports that “World Vision’s American branch will no longer require its more than 1,100 employees to restrict their sexual activity to marriage between one man and one woman.” World Vision president, Richard Stearns, clarified, “The new policy will not exclude someone from employment if they are in a legal same-sex marriage.”

World Vision is in the top ten charities in America and took in over a billion dollars last year and serves over a 100 million people in 100 countries.

This “very narrow policy change,” Stearns explained, “is simply a decision about whether or not you are eligible for employment at World Vision U.S. based on this single issue, and nothing more. . . . This is not an endorsement of same-sex marriage. . . . We’re not caving to some kind of pressure. We’re not on some slippery slope. . . . This is not us compromising. It is us deferring to the authority of churches and denominations on theological issues.”

The rationale for the change is that so-called same-sex marriage is in the same category with differences over baptism, divorce, evolution, and others. “Denominations disagree,” Stearns said, “on many, many things: on divorce and remarriage, modes of baptism, women in leadership roles in the church, beliefs on evolution, etc. . . . So our practice has always been to defer to the authority and autonomy of local churches.”

This issue, Stearns said, “is tearing churches apart, tearing denominations apart, tearing Christian colleges apart, and even tearing families apart. Our board felt we cannot jump into the fight on one side or another on this issue.” Christianity Today seemed to agree that they are not taking a position by asking, “Will supporters, particularly theologically conservative ones, let World Vision adopt a neutral stance on same-sex marriage?” (emphasis added).
Trivializing Perdition and the Cross

This is a tragic development for the cause of Christ, because it trivializes perdition — and therefore, the cross — and because it sets a trajectory for the demise of true compassion for the poor.

When J.I. Packer walked out of the 2002 synod of the Anglican Diocese of New Westminster, he was protesting its decision to “bless same-sex unions.” His rationale is relevant for the developments at World Vision.

First, his words about unity expose the crass alignment of homosexual intercourse and baptism as comparable markers for biblical faithfulness. Packer wrote, “It is most misleading, indeed crass, to call this disagreement simply a difference about interpretation, of the kind for which Anglican comprehensiveness has always sought to make room.”

When World Vision says, “We cannot jump into the fight on one side or another on this issue,” here is the side they do, in fact, jump onto: We forbid fornication and adultery as acceptable lifestyles among our employees (which they do), but we will not forbid the regular practice of homosexual intercourse. To presume that this position is not “jumping into the fight on one side or the other” is fanciful.

But worse than fancy, removing homosexual intercourse from its biblical alignment with fornication and adultery (and greed and theft and drunkenness) trivializes its correlation with perdition.

This was at the heart of why J.I. Packer walked. Referring to all these sins, Packer said, “They are ways of sin that, if not repented of and forsaken, will keep people out of God’s kingdom of salvation.”

Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. (1 Corinthians 6:9–10)

In other words, to treat regular homosexual intercourse as less dangerous than fornication, adultery, greed, theft, and drunkenness is to treat perdition as if it were a small thing, or not really coming. The same text that imperils active fornicators and adulterers and thieves and coveters, also imperils those who practice homosexuality.

Make no mistake, this so-called “neutral” position of World Vision is a position to regard practicing homosexuals (under the guise of an imaginary “marriage”) as following an acceptable Christian lifestyle, on the analogy of choosing infant baptism over believers’ baptism.

Over against this, the apostle Paul says they will not enter the kingdom of heaven. It is that serious. If it were not, God would not have given his Son to be crucified for our rescue. Therefore, World Vision has trivialized perdition and the cross.
Toward the Demise of True Compassion for the Poor

Of course, World Vision does not intend to shipwreck their legacy of compassion for the poor. But that is what they are doing. I say this for two reasons.

First, World Vision has taken a step away from the cry of biblical love, which says, we care about all suffering, especially eternal suffering. Without care about eternal suffering, care about temporal suffering is a mirage. It looks like love, but the greatest gift is being withheld.

When World Vision embraces as an acceptable alternative behavior what God says will lead to eternal suffering (1 Corinthians 6:9–10), it sets a trajectory of lovelessness.

Second, World Vision has aligned itself with liberal Christians who choose not to renounce homosexual practice. Culturally, historically, and biblically this is a huge step toward the powerlessness and growing irrelevance of the mainline liberal establishment. You cannot undermine biblical authority, and trivialize perdition and its blood-bought remedy, and expect to maintain a vibrant spiritual base. It isn’t going to happen.

This means that, without repentance and change, World Vision will go the way of worldliness and weakness. A great superstructure will remain for a season, but the Christian soul will disappear. And who will suffer most? The poor.

Therefore, for the sake of Christ and his call to true compassion, World Vision’s decision is tragic. I pray they will repent and turn back to their more faithful roots.

Be Vigilant. Be Informed. Be Prayerful. Be Discerning. Be Blessed.

6 comments:

  1. If World Vision has repented it should be forgiven and we should move on. However, it has not repented. Rather it has bowed to pressure and when this pressure has gone away it is poised to return to its decision.

    For this reason the only viable solution is a change of leadership. World Vision is not sorry for their initial decision. Rather it is only sorry that so many have objected to it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fools...time for us to turn, walk away and leave them to their own devices. Of course remaining willing to restore them to fellowship after the change back to Biblical principle.
    Bellevue, WA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow..!! that was quick. Just heard that they have reversed their reversal. I hope they learned something.
      Bellevue, WA

      Delete
  3. As painful as these kinds of struggles are for Christians, this is a good thing.....to face "worldly" issues in our communities, and work hard to apply Bibical truth and wisdom to the public debate. I applaud World Vision for engaging the culture, and coming to what I believe is the God-honoring, people loving decision. Blessings sin and apostasy is cowardly for Christians.....speaking truth in love to our neighbors truly is what we have been called to do...painful as that sometimes is for us as well as them. God will bring ffuit forth from the muck......

    ReplyDelete
  4. I couldn't agree more..."Neutrality is not an option on moral issues and biblical Truth." it is either we are for it or against it...as the Lord has said in the holy scriptures..."let your Yes... be yes and your No as your No ....anything more than that will be from the evil one"... indeed, there should be no grey area...in both our moral and spiritual perspective..it's either white or black...

    Personally, I would pray that management of World Vision should revisit the main objective of what they originally stood for and only stick to the "One True Voice"...the voice of God and not be pressured with the various voices and clamor of the world... to only have the proper heavenly wisdom and discernment to execute their company rules for the true benefit of the soul under the guidance of the Holy Spirit...everything has its eternal value so all should seek the Holy Spirit for true enlightenment and guidance, all for the glory of God.

    God's blessings and peace be upon all!

    Say It With God’sWord

    ReplyDelete
  5. Christie Gregor1:02 PM, July 20, 2014



    I couldn't agree more..."Neutrality is not an option on moral issues and biblical Truth." it is either we are for it or against it...as the Lord has said in the holy scriptures..."let your Yes... be yes and your No as your No ....anything more than that will be from the evil one"... indeed, there should be no grey area...in both our moral and spiritual perspective..it's either white or black...

    Personally, I would pray that management of World Vision should revisit the main objective of what they originally stood for and only stick to the "One True Voice"...the voice of God and not be pressured with the various voices and clamor of the world... to only have the proper heavenly wisdom and discernment to execute their company rules for the true benefit of the soul under the guidance of the Holy Spirit...everything has its eternal value so all should seek the Holy Spirit for true enlightenment and guidance, all for the glory of God.

    God's blessings and peace be upon all!

    ReplyDelete

Faith & Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.