Thursday, May 07, 2015

Mitch McConnell Muzzles Republican Senators

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has muzzled Senators Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) from doing what constituents elected them to do---Vote. Have a public opinion.

Rubio and Cotton had proposed amendments to the Iran nuclear agreement.

Rubio was calling for an amendment that would require Iran to acknowledge Israel's right to exist as a state, while Cotton's required Iran to take specific steps, including "full access to suspicious sites" before getting relief from sanctions.

What's wrong with either of them? How can either of these be unacceptable to Republican leadership?

In "Politicland," decisions are often driven more by, well, politics then by what is actually the right thing to do.

McConnell has used his leadership to muzzle Rubio and Cotton.

Cotton told his colleagues, "If you are in the Senate and you don't want to vote, you should leave."

Rubio told them on the record, "If you don't want to vote on things, don't run for office...Be a columnist. Get a talk show."

Cotton's amendment  required full disclosure of Iran's nuclear development including submitting to "a fully-verifiable, anytime anywhere, no notice inspections regimen."

Cotton had added Rubio's amendment to his own as a second degree measure because he said, "They [Iran] continue to say that Israel will be wiped off the map. And if they get nuclear weapons they will have the means to do so."

Senate Majority Leader McConnell has now taken actions that bypass both Rubio and Cotton, after they used a floor tactic to attempt to force a vote on the two amendments.

Following McConnell's action, Sen. Cotton Tweeted, "Congress must stand up and protect U.S. from a nuclear Iran..."

This episode raises the question of priority among elected leaders--personal interests or best interests of the country?

Sen. Rubio said, "Everyone who runs for office knows that what we are called to do here is vote on issues that we sometimes are uncomfortable on."

He said,  "Don't tell me that we can't have votes on things. You can argue that we shouldn't pass them and I'll argue against you. But don't tell me that we can't even vote on them."

"Because," he continued "then what you're saying is you want to be protected from taking a position on them; you don't want to take a position that you think is tough. And that I find to be unacceptable.

Politicians often create legislation that they can vote "for" in one case and "against" in another so they can then report back to their constituents what they believe the folks want to hear.

We've seen it in DC and we've seen it in Olympia.

Most of us would agree. That is unacceptable.

All of us are required to make decisions everyday. That's life. The basis from which we make those decisions is often more important than any single decision, because it creates a direction in our lives.

And often reveals our true character.

Today on the radio I'm talking about the 5 basic principles for discerning God's will in our life decisions.

1. Follow What Has Already Been Revealed

2. Sometimes God's Guidance Is Not Immediately Recognized (Oswald Chambers)

3. God Expects Us To Use Our Own Intelligence.

4. God Doesn't Show Us More Than We Need To Know.

5. How God Guides Us Is His Responsibility. Ours Is To Be Informed, Keep Listening And Keep Walking.

You may join me from anywhere in the world, live at 9 AM PDT or rebroadcast at 7:30 PM PDT. Here's how.

Be Informed. Be Discerning. Be Blessed.


  1. If people continually say that they intent to harm others maybe we should listen to them a little bit. I can't believe these people in politics sometimes.

  2. Well...I guess we should know who isn't a friend of Israel now, and least politically by majority anyway. If find it hard to believe that if people in America were asked, "If a nation continually says they intend to wipe another neighboring country off the map, should we encourage them to have a nuclear program?", that the majority would say, "Yes."

  3. I think the best answer for Iran from the US would have been along the lines of, "Well one of our neighbors (seeing how we live on the same planet together) sort of let us know that they didn't think it would be a very good thing for them, (to encourage any kind of nuclear deal) and the Bible teaches us to love our neighbor as ourselves."

  4. I think it's a sin to offer Iran any kind of nuclear deal.

  5. Nuclear deal?... How about "You no blow Israel off the map, We no blow you off the map."? Then we can all live in peace, or maybe we all find out who the real God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is. I believe lots of America is Christian.

  6. If a peace loving neighbor comes to us with a just cause, asking us to do something for them because of the oppression of one of it's neighbors, it seems to me that we had better learn to listen, see if what he says is so, pray to God, and search the scriptures to find out what is right, and act accordingly if we want to see his blessing. If we don't bless God....and sometimes it takes more than just words, but words are a very good start. Though they are only a start, we need to keep going. The tongue is powerful says the scripture, for good or for evil, and that confession can be unto salvation.

    I believe we need some new people in government. We have some good people and we need more.

  7. I wonder how many voters are tired of hearing politicians say they are working to do one thing, while they in reality are doing the opposite.

    Some politicians may have a story they are going to stick to, but let's remember Proverbs 26:7 (KJV). The proverbs of Solomon were given for many benefits, one of which was to give us discernment. It is my hope that all of us will begin to see some for what they are, even as far as a mile away. This should be possible, as long as they are walking.


Faith and Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.