Friday, January 05, 2018

"Trump Didn't Cause Evangelical Divide, He Exposed It"

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

In a radio interview this week, a prominent evangelical pastor claimed, "Trump didn't cause the evangelical divide, he exposed it."

It's well known that there is a significant divide in the evangelical community, between Jim Wallis and other self-professed "Religious Left" people, and those identified as "Religious Right" who steadfastly hold to biblical truth regarding marriage, the sanctity of life, Israel and national sovereignty.

With 81% of evangelicals voting for President Trump, that divide has become more visible...and more divisive.

A closer look.


Since Donald Trump defied all the political pundits' predictions and emerged as the Republican candidate for the presidency---and then won the national election to become President Trump last year, politics as usual has gone up in smoke.

The usual political games our "public servants" (a.k.a. politicians) normally play in Congress has intensified with Democrats claiming their expressed goal is to derail Trump---regardless of the merit of his policies. And some Republicans are trying to pretend nothing has changed.

However, a divide within the Christian, or "evangelical" community, has also been exposed.

Seeking to exploit the issue and undermine conservative Christians, the media immediately jumped on the issue.

November 2016---just days after the election, the very Left but widely read Atlantic published a story titled, "The Evangelical Reckoning Over Donald Trump."

The piece wistfully said, "For months, the stories came in waves. The death of the religious right. The new moral minority...everyone wanted to know what conservative evangelicals, who have long been considered a unified voting bloc would do. Now we know."

And they said, "But vote counts conceal deep, painful fractures among...evangelical Christians."

From then on, The Atlantic, Huff Post, ThinkProgress and a herd of other Left-leaning publications began a new drumbeat for what they call "progress"

By this past August, The Atlantic and their news brethren on the Left had found their stride.

The Atlantic ran a story with this revealing title: "Evangelicals Are Bitterly Split Over Advising Trump."

The essence of this story, I believe, was to heighten the "bitter split" within evangelicalism---and in particular other more specific differences. They quoted a New York City evangelical pastor: "It became obvious that there was a deepening conflict in values between myself and the administration."

This week Dr. Robert Jeffress, pastor of the 20,000 member First Baptist Church in Dallas, Texas, was asked by Janet Mefferd on her American Family radio show, about the "much discussed evangelical divide."

Jefferess, who serves on Trump's executive evangelical advisory board, said, "This is hypocritical of the evangelicals who say their personal piety won't allow them to support President Trump...how self-righteous is that?"

He said, "President Trump didn't cause the divide---he has exposed it." And continued to tell Mefferd that many of those same evangelicals had no problem backing Reagan who was a twice-married former Democrat, who ran against the monogamous, Baptist Sunday School teacher Jimmy Carter in 1980.

Carter, most concede, was among one of the worst presidents in American history. Reagan, one of the best.

Pastor Jeffress said, "What we're seeing is the divide between these evangelical elites who continue to resist President Trump's policies and the vast majority of evangelicals in the pews who swept him into office and continue to support him."

"In fact," he says, "it's the never-Trump evangelicals who have left their core theology behind."

He says, "It's been a growing divide between those who take the Bible seriously and those who don't. I call them the 'evangelical elite', the Christianity Today crowd."

In fact, Christianity Today has written a series of articles that are in support of those who hold the very views Jeffress is referring to.

In their article titled, "Why Tim Keller, Max Lucado and Hundreds of Evangelical Leaders Oppose Trump's Refugee Plan," CT reported, "More than 500 conservative evangelical pastors and leaders representing all 50 states are urging President Donald Trump to reverse his temporary ban on refugee resettlement and his 'dramatic reduction' of the total refugees America will accept this fiscal year."

They then make the case for open borders, etc. on behalf of World Relief and the other 9 agencies that resettle refugees in America.

They may truly hold their beliefs as "gospel," however, resettlement is also very profitable for these groups. I have written about it in the past.

Perhaps the most revealing illustration is found in the words of Jim Wallis' latest commentary, which was published yesterday afternoon to his thousands of followers on the religious Left---and a few like me who follow what he says.

Dr. Jeffress is right. Trump didn't create this fracture, but he is certainly exposing it.

Wallis begins with this: "I feel politically homeless as we enter 2018---and I know I am not alone. Many Christians are feeling the same...especially white evangelicals have undertaken completely uncritical support of a president who is the antithesis of the gospel of Jesus Christ---endangering the reputation of Christianity, especially among a new generation."

Then he says how he really feels: "Republican leadership has sold its party's soul to a bad, amoral, childish, and dangerous man. Most of my Republican friends agree... He has been revealed as an intellectually shallow and mentally incompetent leader, a person who lacks any moral conscience, an unapologetic promoter of racial bigotry..."

"And," Wallis says, "The GOP has disregarded the best values of principled conservatism, fiscal integrity and responsibility, an allegiance to truth and honesty...and genuine pro-family values..."

There's much more of the same about Trump and those who voted for him.

It becomes clear that those who stand with Wallis would find it impossible to support any policy that the Trump administration would put forward---regardless of its merit.

While Jim Wallis is critical of the Democratic Party, it is a more "hopeful" critique, calling for the Democrats to reach out more to those like himself who feel politically homeless.

He notes that an "outreach" would include his commitment to government expansion of welfare, reducing the number of abortions, but not "criminalizing" abortion, gender equality, same-sex marriage, and a pro-Palestinian position toward Israel. His worldview also calls for social justice and a commitment to join the global warming movement---all couched in biblical terms.

Wallis once again affirms that Pastor Jeffress is right.

The "never Trump" evangelicals---the religious Left, "have left their core theology behind" if indeed they ever held it.

Be Informed. Be Discerning. Be Vigilant. Be Bold. Be Faithful. Be Prayerful.


4 comments:

  1. "Carter was one of the worst presidents"... Any best / worst list of anything must by definition encompass the entire collection of objects / people being evaluated. No one / thing can be exempt from the list. To say Carter was one of the worst simply places him in the worst 50 percentile of the list of presidents. That evaluation does not place him at the bottom of the list. The bottom of the list is reserved for Obama. He did more damage to America than all the rest of the "worst" 50% put together did.

    By and large, people are judging best and worst from political (read man's will - opinion) standpoint, not God's will. Of course those who don't know God, have no other basis to operate from. I find it interesting that all this "political" debate is exposing more than the "evangelical" divide, it's exposing many self proclaimed evangelicals to hold a humanist view more than a Biblical view.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "his commitment to government expansion"

    Men create governments then fall down and pray to it

    Which sounds an awful lot like what it is, idol worship

    Their error begins here

    Exo 20:3  Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In all the ranting and raving and endless dialogue that is out there, I would remind all Christians of Paul's admonitions in Romans 13:1-7. "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God's wrath but also for the sake of conscience. For because of this you also pay taxes, for the authorities are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed." But if you don't believe in the authority of God's Word that reference wouldn't mean very much to you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey! but Richard Stearns, president of World Vision, wrote in his 2002 Seattle Times editorial "Jimmy Carter, America's most-respected former president, is traveling to Africa..."

    And in his letter to the editor a few years later Stearns calls out "[a]ll of us must engage in social justice... the church as a whole was late to the fight against AIDS." As if the churches and temples faithful to Mosaic commandments and Jesus ever had abandoned the proscription of adultery! To condone sin is exactly what invited the scourge as AIDS. Way to go Satan!

    So, yes, external politics simply exposes the self deception that is thick as rain here in Seattle.

    ReplyDelete

Faith and Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.