Wednesday, April 11, 2018

Does Zuckerberg Have A "Nimrod" Complex?

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg explained (not under oath) to lawmakers on the Hill yesterday that he had made a mistake in selling the personal data profiles of tens of millions---some say as many as 1 billion--- of Facebook users to Cambridge Analytica, so they could sell the profiles, with both companies making millions off the users who voluntarily gave Zuckerberg their information in the first place.

Now that Zuckerberg is worth $64 billion ( after losing $10 billion in the past couple of weeks), and has about 2.2 billion people on his Facebook platform, what are his goals going forward?

They are well defined in his formal statement. Nimrod comes to mind.

In the hearing yesterday, Republican senators were direct with Zuckerberg, while Democrats had a more focused, less threatening approach.

Washington State's Senator Maria Cantwell asked if any of his employees had been involved with Cambridge Analytica helping the Trump campaign, and if Zuckerberg thought the US should adopt stricter regulations like Europe has done forcing companies like his to give users more control?

It was a Democrat, yes, Democrat Dick Durbin---of whom I am no fan---who asked the most poignant question in my opinion.

"Would you be comfortable sharing with us the name of the hotel you stayed in last night?"

"Um".....long pause, then "No."

Durbin continued: "If you messaged anybody this week, would you share with us the names of the people you've messaged?"

Zuckerberg: "Senator, no, I would probably not choose to do that publicly here."

Durbin: "I think that might be what this is all about. Your right to privacy, the limits of your right to privacy, and how much you'd give away in modern America."

All this will be regurgitated throughout today on local and national news---spun to support the local bias.

Bottom line. What we at Facebook are doing is good for me, but not for thee.

The Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) is wondering if Facebook has become so big and so ingrained into the world culture, with about 2.2 billion users, it's "too big to fix."

CBN also reports that "The National Religious Broadcasters (NRB) had 5 questions they hoped would be asked of Zuckerberg by our public servants yesterday. Generally those questions were not asked.

The NRB questions included concerns about Christian themes being deleted or banned, including a picture of a cross put up by a Catholic university to commemorate Easter. Facebook rejected the ad because "it did not meet its standards." Which prohibit "shocking, sensational or excessively violent materials."

Apparently, in their mind, the cross is too offensive for the "community."

After pushback, asking which criteria was violated by the cross, Facebook reviewed and reversed the decision to censor the cross.

This is not an isolated incident. Most likely NRB's concerns remain intact today.

Is Facebook Too Big to Fix?

Last year CEO Zuckerberg issued his plan for the ages titled, "Building Global Community," specifically identifying the goals and how to achieve them.

Honestly, when I read the plan, my mind went to the biblical story of Noah's great-grandson, Nimrod, and his Tower of Babel.

This is a profile of biblical Nimrod.

Much has been written about Nimrod including in many extra-biblical sources like those of historian Josephus.

Josephus, a reliable historian in most cases, believed that the Nimrod's purpose for building the Tower of Babel was to provide a refuge if God ever decided to flood the earth again. His goal, in effect, was to save the people. The motive, according to Josephus, was "to protect humanity from against another flood." Therefore Nimrod was building something for the good of all mankind.

However, the biblical account reveals that Nimrod, a man of significant physical size, strength, and ability, was acting more from rebellion or a God like complex, than a motive of trying to help humankind.

Josephus also affirms that from his own research.

Nimrod was rebellious against God, just like his antediluvian forefathers and persuaded his followers not ascribe their strength to God, but to understand that his leadership and goals and abilities were the source of their happiness and contentment---thus they joined him in the building of the Tower of Babel.

Nimrod, in essence, was assuming the role of God.

Nimrod appears as a character in the mythology of many ancient cultures.

The name Nimrod has been used as a descriptive term to describe a hunting expert or great hunter. It was also used during the 19890s to describe a "geek" or socially awkward person.

On February 16, 2017, Mark Zuckerberg issued his plan titled "Building Global Community."

It's lengthy, but you can review it from the link.

He began his message with, "On our journey to connect the world, we often discuss products we're I want to focus on the most important question of all: are we building the world we all want?"

The rest of his statement defines "the world we want" and how to get there.

The world we want.

The world Zuckerberg wants is a global one that includes, "supportive communities, safe communities, informed communities, civically-engaged communities and inclusive communities."

Zuckerberg says, "We at Facebook can develop a social infrastructure to give people the power to build a global community that works for all of us."

He identifies how Facebook becomes the new local communities, replacing the towns and neighborhoods of the past---giving people hope for the future, as we come together in our shared values.

He speaks of how people with terminal illnesses are helped through Facebook all around the world.

Regarding "Safe Communities," he says, "This is a moment of truth, as we build a global community." He notes that many times people join together to form a non-profit organization to help the needy, but often those fail due to lack of funding, etc.

He notes, "The Facebook community is in a unique position to help prevent harm, assist during a crisis or come together to rebuild afterward."

An informed global citizenry is a very important goal for Facebook, he says. "Connecting everyone to the internet is necessary for building an informed community."

And everyone, now informed through Facebook must "engage in the civic process: voting, engaging with issues and representatives, speaking out, and sometimes organizing. so we can ensure the political process reflect our values."

And finally, he addresses the importance of an "Inclusive Community."

"Building an inclusive global community requires establishing a new process for citizens worldwide to participate in community governance. That means we need Community Standards that reflects our collective values for what should and should not be allowed," says Mark Zuckerberg.

And in conclusion, Zuckerberg said, "History has had many moments like today."

Indeed it has.

While Zuckerberg's world is bigger that Nimrod's was, the common globalist goals are the same.

And neither are too big to fix.

"Be Informed. Be Discerning. Be Vigilant."


  1. I don't think it's too big to fix, however it is too big to be perfect. Some stiff fines from time to time as appropriate could be the fix.

  2. Go a mile up and look down on Zuckerberg ...what do we see?
    We see a small man attempting to play god...why ??... because he can!

    Secular Leftism is taking Western Civilization by storm. It is a religion in fact; it requires greater faith and has more dogmas than Christianity.

    The foundation of Secular Leftism (sometimes called Progressivism) can be summed up in two planks;

    1. "I refuse to be accountable to anyone greater than myself."
    2. "I believe mankind is essentially good by nature, and “we” can eventually create Utopia on Earth with the help of proper government controls on motives, belief systems, and actions.

    #1 paves the way for the premise that thee is no such thing as absolute truth, as every individual has the right to create their own truth that is to be respected with an attitude of "tolerance", unless it disagrees with 1 or 2.
    #2 paves the way for the "End justifies the means" pathway to glory.

    These confused and fundamentally hypocritical non-thinkers have embraced what feels good but makes no rational sense. Logic and rational thought are banned, because they get in the way of "free feelings" and the fantasies of blind optimism.

    Enter a young inexperienced man who has no Godly wisdom and very little human wisdom, and give that man the most powerful global tool any man has ever wielded in the history of our planet.

    Dangerous? Absolutely!
    Controllable? Likely not for the betterment of mankind, simply because vested interests of those with the power of influence will prevail in protecting and promoting their special interests.

    In short, mankind is in trouble! This is nothing new if we study Scripture and the history of man's self-destruction every time he/she have turned their backs on God's influence and denied His sovereignty.

    Back to Zuckerberg's vision of "Building a Global Community"; a frightening diatribe that every breathing human should read and deeply consider with wisdom and discernment, employing Godly wisdom as opposed to worldly wisdom.

    Hundreds of revealing quotes from his diatribe can be summed up this statement he makes.. "We may not have the power to create the world we want immediately, but we can all start working on the long term today. In times like these, the most important thing we at Facebook can do is develop the social infrastructure to give people the power to build a global community that works for all of us.

    A secular globalism with a diluted World-Church and a Totalitarian State standing in for the goal of nearly all the powerful and wealthy on today's Earth. Unique cultures, middle class survival, and national sovereignty are all marked for extinction, and this most powerful weapon currently called "Facebook" has the power to manipulate and guide mankind into that new Godless era in keeping with His prophesy.

    So..we can pray constantly, fervently, and specifically for each element of this growing malignancy. Then...we can stand openly and boldly for God's truth without shame and without fear of whatever repercussions God allows us to endure as those who are proudly called by His name.

    Truth is a lonely warrior...



Faith and Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.