Thursday, November 07, 2019

Progressive Scientists: "Must Control Population To Beat Climate Change"

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF
Bloomberg is reporting that 11,000 scientists from 50 countries are reporting the "Earth needs fewer people to beat the climate crises."

Which people group should go first?

Let's take a closer look at where this kind of thinking takes us.

Be informed.

Evolving from Global Warming to Climate Change, to Climate Crises, to Climate Emergency.


Bloomberg begins their article with this:

Forty years ago, scientists from 50 nations converged on Geneva to discuss what was then called the “CO2-climate problem.” At the time, with reliance on fossil fuels having helped trigger the 1979 oil crisis, they predicted global warming would eventually become a major environmental challenge. The scientists got to work, building a strategy on how to attack the problem.
Their goal was to get ahead of the problem before it was too late. But after a fast start, the fossil fuel industry, politics and the prioritization of economic growth over planetary health slowed them down. Now four decades later, a larger group of scientists is sounding another, much more urgent alarm. More than 11,000 experts from around the world are calling for a critical addition to the main strategy of dumping fossil fuels for renewable energy.

The scientists say, "There needs to be far fewer humans on the planet."

Bloomberg goes on to quote from the Oxford Academic article titled, "World Scientists' Warning of Climate Emergency."

Both give endless charts of temperature increasing on the surface of the Earth, oceans rising, the Arctic shrinking and greenhouse gases rising, with the promise that they are "telling it like it is."

Are they really telling it like it is?


The Oxford piece says, "Scientists have a moral obligation to clearly warn humanity of any catastrophic threat and to 'tell it like it is'."

And their truth that they are telling is this: "Clearly and unequivocally planet Earth is facing a climate emergency."

They discredit Earth's surface temperatures because accurate surface temperatures do not support their emergency narrative.

New, accurate monitoring stations have been set up across this nation away from concrete structures that hold heat and all of them are reporting there has been no increase in surface temperatures in more than a decade.

In August I wrote an article revealing that scientists are speaking out about the false narrative coming from the progressive scientists. There is much dissent in the scientific community about what the well-funded climate emergency folks are reporting. Even a distinguished NOAA scientist has come out publicly against what is being reported to the public. I suggested we follow the money.

Marc Morano, the head of a conservative science reporting organization, posted this on Twitter:



Indeed it is. And that's the main point. The Green Movement---call it what you want, is a front for reordering society as we know it, redistributing the wealth and advancing socialism. Socialists love it. It is the ultimate wealth distribution tool. And there's lots of grant money available---and much money to be made by "Green" advocates. Ask Al Gore.

Now the climate extremists are reverting to population control to save the human race.

Population control. Who should go first?


Scientists are warning the world, "There needs to be far fewer people on planet Earth," for the human race to survive.

While the scientists are not using the word "eugenics", they are looking at ways we might reduce the population through birth control, etc.

History shows that western culture has been obsessed with improving the human race through proper breeding.

In 1883, Sir Francis Galton, a respected scholar and cousin of Charles Darwin, used the word "eugenics" for the first time. He believed that the human race can help direct its future by selectively breeding individuals who have desired "traits."

"Eugenics" is a Greek word that means "good birth."

Plato said that human baby production should be limited to people selected for desirable qualities.

After reading cousin Darwin's "On the Origin of Species", Galton gave up his dream in medicine and mathematics to study the idea of evolution to improve the human race. He believed that evolution could be accelerated through eugenics.

That notion caught on, and eugenics became a popular social issue---all for the "betterment of mankind."

In fact, an "Official Eugenics Record Office" was opened with Alexander Graham Bell serving as chairman of the board.

Much has been published about this new age of "enlightened" thinking regarding saving the human race from itself.

No one gave it more serious thought than a young Margaret Sanger.

Margaret Sanger's motivation in founding Planned Parenthood.


Margaret was born in Corning, New York on September 14, 1879, and died in Tucson, AZ on September 6, 1966.

During her years she would become royalty to the abortion industry. In fact, the Margaret Sanger Award is given each year to the woman who did the most to advance what PP calls women's healthcare. The rest of us call it abortion.


Hillary has said she "cherishes" her Margaret Sanger award.

It is well known that Planned Parenthood was founded out of a desire to control the population by weeding out the "undesirables."

Absent on the PP web site is Sanger's advocacy for "a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring." (From her article, "A Plan for Peace.")

Also absent is her promotion of the "American Baby Code," in which she seeks "to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit."

In a 1939 letter, Sanger wrote to a colleague, "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population."

Hitler nor Sanger were the first, nor will they be the last to eugenics.

Planned Parenthood is largely the reason why black babies are aborted in America three times more often than white babies, and Hispanic preborns are killed one and a half times more often than whites.

In fact, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, research compiled by TooManyAborted.com, abortion is the number one killer of black lives in the United States. More than HIV. More than heart disease. More than cancer. Abortion snuffs out more black lives than all other causes of death combined."

Clearly, black lives do not matter to these folks.

Masquerading as a benevolent friend, Planned Parenthood is doing its part to control the population, because it was birthed out of the same ideology as this new scientific proclamation.

Will the climate emergency extremists begin population control with those who deny their claims?

America is better than this.

Be Informed. Be courageous. Be Discerning. Be Prayerful.


1 comment:

  1. With tongue in cheek, perhaps a place to start reducing human population would be with the 11000 scientists. Obviously they don't trust in God. Perhaps next could be the progressives who deny God and want humanistic control of earth. Ultimately of course this line of reasoning leads to everyone being eliminated that disagree agree with me. That leaves only me and I don't deserve to be here either apart from Christ. Maybe we ought to try doing what God told us to by bringing the good news to every person everywhere and leave the rest (like climate change) to God. After all He created and sustains it all, each moment of our life. The outright lie that humanity is causing climate change is full on effort to place humanity in charge and deny or ignore God. Sheer stupidity. That shows their complete non understanding of even the most basic characteristic of God. Sin elevates man and diminishes God.

    ReplyDelete

Faith and Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.