Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Communism In America

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF


Benny Johnson, a significant and trusted social media influencer, recently posted: 

Communist NYC Mayor Mamdani is interfering in American Foreign Policy again. First, his administration was caught setting up secret meetings with Iran. Now he's threatening to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. A city mayor who has zero authority to interfere in US foreign policy or order arrests of foreign leaders. Did he violate '18 USC 875' by transmitting threats and extortion-style demands across state or national lines with his reckless statements? Mamdani should be investigated over this and denaturalized, then deported himself.

New York Democrat Mayor Mamdani has become the leader of a growing segment of the Democrat Party that will ultimately destroy that party.

We must not allow them to destroy America.

And much more concerning, it will destroy America from within if left unchecked.

Be informed, not misled.

Johnson continues:

Communist NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who just came to this country, chose to become an American, is deciding he is the foremost authority to tell Americans what it means to be American.

He has the AUDACITY, on America's 250th birthday, to call our great nation "an arena of supremacy" — a nation that "persecutes," ruled by "oligarchs."

He sneers that his fellow Americans are "small, weak, unoriginal."

He says “ICE is invading our streets” while he endorses and welcomes an invasion of third-world savages.

Millions dream of the gift he was given.

A man who spends his time burning the most American city to the ground does not deserve to be America, let alone dictate to others what it means to be an American.

Therein lies the greatest political issue of our time.



 These people are free indeed to believe, as they do, in Marxism and its subsidiary economic and societal models, socialism and communism. But, according to their released 2026 platform, having them as elected officials is a threat to our Constitutional Republic and our representative democracy.

Allen West describes the threat this way:

How is it possible to have individuals sworn in as Members of Congress when they subscribe to, advocate for, a platform that is the antithesis of our governing system as established in our Constitution, to which they are supposedly taking an oath? For that matter, how can we have individuals sworn in as elected officials placing their hand upon a Quran when that ideology is completely antithetical to our rule of law, as well as a book that calls for the death of "non-believers"? Perhaps that is a topic for another day.

The Founding Fathers of our Constitution—James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay—studied and read the works of French political philosopher Charles Montesquieu, namely his 1748 writing "The Spirit of the Laws," and applied his separation of powers theory in developing our governing system. This is just the same as Thomas Jefferson's studying and reading of John Locke's Natural Rights theory in framing our Declaration of Independence. I would offer that the authors of the DSA 2026 platform have certainly not read any of these foundational works that have created the longest-running Constitutional Republic that the world has known. No, they are students of a delusional failure of a man named Karl Marx, who wrote his Communist Manifesto in 1848, 100 years after Montesquieu's work.

If these deranged individuals are allowed any say in our governance, they intend to destroy the concept of separation of powers and coequal branches of government, replacing it with a dictatorial entity of the House of Representatives, a singular body of Congress. 

They state in their 2026 platform that the U.S. Senate should be abolished, meaning that smaller states would have no equal representation in our Congress. This is their intent. The hypocrisy of their decrying concentrated power in Washington, D.C., while seeking to elevate concentrated power to the major population centers and states, is highly concerning.

The Democratic Socialists of America advocate abolishing the Executive and Judicial branches as established in the Constitution. What these Marxists propose is that their concentrated-power branch appoint an executive and judges, meaning the end of coequal branches of government and the establishment of an authoritarian legislative body that will reflect one-party rule. There will be no system of checks and balances, just a Robespierre-like House of Representatives that rules rather than governs. There will no longer be an Electoral College where every state is competitive in a presidential election. The DSA rejects the idea of a President of the United States.

How can anyone accept this as anything but clear sedition and certainly unconstitutional? There can be no argument that the DSA 2026 platform destroys the Constitution of the United States. So, how does one get sworn in to support and defend the very rule of law that they want to eradicate?

Allen West says the indoctrination kids get in American public schools today in civics is nothing more than leftist indoctrination, or "bovine excrement."

He says, "When these Marxists speak of abolishing ICE, they speak of abolishing immigration law and enforcement; that is also Title 8, U.S.C. § 1325, which makes unauthorized entry into the United States a federal offense. As Antifa once chanted, "no borders, no walls, no USA at all." So, what does the DSA see America becoming? That is an easy question to answer: just a piece of land between Canada, Mexico, and three large bodies of water where anyone can enter. And as some DSA candidates have asserted, no illegal immigrant, including those who have committed further crimes, should be deported. That goes right along with ending the prison system, so there will be no consequences or ramifications for anyone breaking the law. Leftism is lawlessness at its ultimate."

West explains, "I would suppose that the authors of the DSA 2026 platform have never read French economist Frederic Bastiat's essay 'The Law,' written in 1850, two years after Marx's Communist Manifesto. Bastiat articulates that it is the purpose of government, the law, to secure the life, liberty, and property of the individual, their natural rights. Instead, Marxists such as these DSA charlatans would use government for the sole purpose of subjugating the individual and, as Marx wrote, seizing their property. And if the law is defined by the Marxist ideological agenda, criminals run rampant, and the individual citizen is disarmed, what is the recourse? Yes, exactly what we saw happen in what was once one of the most prosperous nations in our hemisphere, Venezuela, after the rise of one Hugo Chavez. Someone whom American Marxists lauded and praised, no different from every other leftist dictator from Lenin to Stalin to Mao to Castro."

The most disturbing aspect of the DSA 2026 platform is that it calls for the elimination of the Department of Defense/War. 

Takeaway

There was no crisis anywhere in the world from Southeast Asia to the Caribbean, from sub-Saharan Africa to the Middle East, in which the ideological ambitions of Moscow and its imitators, driven by Marxist-Leninist thought, were not involved throughout the 20th and into the 21st century.

This is the reality of socialism — a pseudo-religion grounded in pseudo-science and enforced by political tyranny. This is the case against socialism — a god that failed, a science that never was, a political system headed for the ash heap of history.

Be Informed. Be Discerning. Be Vigilant. Be Loyal. Be Strong. Be Engaged. Be Prayerful.

Posted by