Wednesday, September 16, 2020

"A Harris Administration?"--The Mask Slips

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

What was only supposed to be whispered in backrooms has apparently become so common-place among the Biden team that it was said out loud to a group of Latino business owners in Arizona on Saturday.

Kamala Harris, who is supposed to be running for vice-president, told the business group that "A Harris administration..." would have their back.

Have they already disposed of Joe before the election? Or is this merely good planning practices?

Be informed, not misled.

I'm not suggesting a Harris administration would be worse than a Biden administration because in either case, it's well known that Harris and other handlers are already pulling the strings when Biden speaks or even leaves his home.

Biden originally said when naming Harris as his running mate, that one of the reasons he chose her was because she is "ready to lead on day one."

Clearly, the Democrat Party doesn't agree, because Harris did not win enough support from fellow progressives in the primary to even stay in the race---in fact, she was forced to withdraw from the primaries before her home state, California, had even voted.

After running a chaotic, disorganized campaign, Sen Harris dropped out of the primaries with zero votes and zero delegates, was not popular among the Democrats---even seen as not politically viable.

The unmasking.

The Arizona Republic quoted Ms. Harris:
"As part of our Build Back Better agenda, we will need to make sure you have a president in the White House who actually sees you...A Harris administration together with Joe Biden..."

Soon after, she corrected herself referring to a "Biden-Harris" administration.

This wouldn't have meant much if Joe Biden's personal decline was not so obvious to most everyone who is paying attention.

And if he had not identified himself as "placeholder" president, and a "transition" president.

Biden furthered speculation as to what he and Harris are up to yesterday afternoon while speaking to military veterans in Florida. After assuring the veterans he would help military spouses be able to find employment as they move from place to place, he said: "The Harris-Biden administration will relaunch that effort..."

Harris-Biden? Should he win the election, is he going to trade jobs with her?

Joe's decline.

Former White House stenographer Mike McCormick, who was assigned to exclusively work with Joe Biden during his 8 years in the Obama administration, is noting Biden's dramatic cognitive deterioration in the past number of months.

He told the Washington Free Beacon that it is a complete difference from what he was in 2017. "He's lost his step and he doesn't seem to have the same mental acuity as he did four years ago."

He says, "He doesn't have the energy, he doesn't have the pace of his speaking. He's a different guy."

He also notes that Joe Biden is more and more losing his train of thought---particularly getting "lost" during interviews...It's not Joe Biden anymore."

President Biden--President Harris, does it matter?

When Joe Biden announced that Kamala Harris would be his running mate, The Hill---a left-leaning news organization began their story with this:
"Poor Joe Biden. This is his third try, but the progressive wing of his party painted him into a narrow, no-win corner with the demand that his vice-presidential pick be a woman of color."

They continued, "Biden gets nothing from picking her as his running mate."

And they note that she, a woman of color, will now be forced to defend Biden's past racial remarks and his vote on busing early in his political career and Biden's sexual misconduct allegations.

But the press have effectively put all that to rest by ignoring it. No problem.

Harris has a political heritage of law enforcement as California's Attorney General, but the deals she made regarding how she acted on various cases is highly questionable, and any value she may have had in law enforcement has been undermined by the Democrats tolerance---even celebration of the riots ("peaceful protests") that continue in our cities.

Her contributing to, and encouraging others to also contribute to the fund that bails out rioters who are arrested, doesn't resonate with most law-abiding citizens either.

She was part of a radical Democrat leadership team in Sacramento that oversaw the highest income taxes in the country--over 12.3%. Biden has already promised higher taxes. Harris certainly knows how to drive that forward.

She was part of the group of extreme environmentalists that declared a drought, then diverted a trillion gallons of fresh water from California's families and farms and dumped it into the San Francisco Bay.

They set wind and solar quotas, eventually bankrupting the largest utility. And the mismanagement of their forests is causing the wildfires that are now being attributed to "climate change."

Harris and her California colleagues oversaw the destruction of San Francisco and Los Angles with their "sanctuary" and "illegal alien" policies.

President Harris-Speaker Pelosi. What a team. Whom would she choose for her vice-president?

This election, by all accounts, will be the most consequential election since Abraham Lincoln.

It has been said, "Bad officers are elected by good citizens who don't vote."

The task for each citizen is to decide which is bad---and which is good.

Then vote.

Be Informed. Be Discerning. Be Vigilant. Be Prayerful. Vote