Wednesday, April 14, 2010

School District Finally Responds to Parent Regarding "Day Of Truth"

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF
I received an email this morning from the "parent" in the University Place School District we featured in yesterday's blog. He said, "Gary after you published your blog yesterday, things started happening. When the school district became aware that you had made their communications with me public, they finally responded."

I have included the further communications between the parent and the school district. For their previous communications you may read yesterday's blog.

After the communications were made public on our website, the parent received the following response from the school district:

[ parents name], as I've told you before, students who initiate 'Day of Truth'
activities would be afforded the same rights, within the same parameters,
as for any other student-initiated activities, including 'Day of Silence.'


Parent's Response:

Ms. Banks,

That is profoundly dishonest. You have never stated to me in the past or
anyone else that I am aware of, that students "would be afforded the same
rights" concerning the "Day of Truth" as they are now or have been in the
past concerning the "Day of Silence," until now.

Second, you still have not answered my question. Are school officials,
teachers, students and parents in the UPSD clearly aware of this policy?
That they may speak openly and freely distribute literature about the
truth and consequences of homosexual behavior without fear of harassment,
threat, punishment, loss of employment or future denial of advancement
and salary increases.

If so, may I please see a copy of this policy in writing and the memo
that has been sent to all within the UPSD making this policy clear?


School District's response:

I have answered this same question for you in past years; my
answer has been consistent with what I believe to be our legal
obligations. Students--at all times--are entitled to their opinions and
convictions, and to voice them in school to the extent they are not
determined to be disruptive to the educational environment or to infringe
on the rights of other students. You and I have had many exchanges on
this issue (or related issues) and I have always responded to you in as
direct and honest a manner as I am able; you are entitled to disagree
with my interpretation of my responsibilities, but please do NOT call me
dishonest. I have always responded to you respectfully, and I expect the
same consideration from you. patti.

Parent's Response:

Ms. Banks,

You have never in any of our previous exchanges stated that the UPSD has
a policy in place that "treats equally" - "what you believe is consistent
with your legal obligations - that students are entitled to their
opinions and convictions - and to voice them," for both the "DAY OF
TRUTH" and the highly controversial "Day of Silence," until now.

However, although you have now made this clear to me that this is UPSD
policy, you continue to dodge and duck the simple YES or NO question that
I have asked several times and have yet to receive an answer to. Have all
school officials, teachers, students and parents been made aware of this
policy? That is, that teachers and students are clearly aware that they
may freely "voice their personal opinions" about the truth and
consequences of homosexuality on the nationally recognized "DAY OF TRUTH"
(4-15-2010) like teachers and students are aware that they are free to
"voice their personal opinions" of homosexuality on the highly
controversial "Day of Silence," with the UPSD's support?

If so, may I please see a copy of this policy? May I please see a copy of
the memo or the email stating that this is UPSD policy, that has been
sent to all within the district?

Patti, I have always responded to you with respect, but it is frustrating
that you refuse to answer a simply YES or NO question and make available
what I ask.

School District's Response:

You are right; there is no specific, written policy beyond my obligations
to follow the law with regard to student speech at school. The law as I
understand it is that students may engage in a wide range of 'free speech'
activities, so long as they do not substantially or materially interfere
with the normal operation of the school, or cause a disruption, or
infringe on the rights of other students. If students choose to initiate
the 'Day of Truth' activities you outline, then we would apply these same
parameters to them, and if there was no disruption, etc., then we would
act to prohibit the students' activities.

Parent's Response:


Thank you for somewhat answering my question. However, you didn't make it
clear if all school officials, teachers, students and parents within the
district have been made aware of this policy concerning the
nationally recognized "DAY OF TRUTH?"

School District's Response:

I have communicated this to all district administrators.

Parent's Response:

Thank you for your commitment to the youth in University Place, making the schools here the benchmark of excellence in this state!

May I see a copy of this communication?

(Parent's Name.)

School District's Response:

I want to clarify student speech issues that may arise in association with
the 'Day of Silence' or other student initiated observances, etc. As you
may know, the Supreme Court, in Tinker, established that there be wide
latitude for student speech of any kind--including such observances as
wearing armbands (this was specifically the issue in the Tinker case),
pins/buttons, etc. Essentially, the court has held this is protected
speech, unless district administrators can establish that student
participation in these activities will cause disruption to the educational
environment, or infringe on the rights of other students. This question
has been raised recently, by community members asking whether students
would be permitted to participate in activities around a "Day of Truth", a
kind of response to the "Day of Silence" observances, and the goal of
which is to "-speak openly about the truth and consequences of
homosexuality ."

Specific to the "Day of Truth," if students chose to participate in these
observances, the same parameters would apply as would apply to the "Day of
Silence" observation. Please let me know directly if you have any
questions or concerns. patti.


This is an example of what is required to be vigilant in regard to your child and public education. It is not easy, but absolutely necessary. It is also an example of the kind of exchange parents who oppose school district's "non-sponsored" agendas can expect.

Be Prayerful. Be Vigilant. Be Respectful, but , Be Active.

Gary Randall
Faith & Freedom

Click here to add these blogs to your email inbox.


  1. Clearly your reader is being intentionally obtuse to try and create an issue where there is none. This is borne out by the fact that numerous comments on yesterday's blog were able to see that students participating in the highly controversial "Day of Truth" would receive the same treatment as those participating in the nationally recognized "Day of Silence".

    Seems to me that your reader (with your assist) is trying to stir up controversy where none exists. In addition to the highly loaded terminology she insists upon using, she keeps trying to equate the student and teacher activity. As far as I know teachers are NOT allowed to participate in the nationally recognized "Day of Silence", so why would they expect to be able to participate in the highly controversial "Day of Truth"? Students may have free speech rights at school, but teachers do not. They must follow district rules and guidelines, just as any employee must follow their employer's rules when at work.

  2. How embarassing for the parent, 'patti' just keeps saying the same thing over and over and the parent just doesn't get it.

    Go to the 'Day of Silence' website - nothing about it demeans others is only about standing against aggressions against other students. Nothing about it disrupts classes because they are told to obey the instructor at all times and never to do anything outside the law.

    Contrast with the 'Day of Truth', what is all about confrontation, telling how qualities some students might have are bad and wrong, and passing out propaganda which actually can be considered true disruption of school routine (which has been ruled to be within a schools right to proscribe).

    Again, the 'Silence' group is acting more 'Christian' than the Christianists, being less disruptive than the 'Truth' group and still the Christianists pretend they are the ones being beset upon - again not surprising in the slightest.

  3. I think this kind of exchange is why some parents are hesitent to require accountability from school districts and simply remain silent. Thanks Gary, for keeping us informed.

  4. I find it concerning that it took so much from the parent to get the administrator to finally come clean. They are very skilled at not answering direct questions and pretending to not sponsor something while they advance it.

  5. Thank you Faith and Freedom for using your influence to at least cause the school district to admit there is no policy and thanks to the parent who would not give up. We, as parents, can learn from this. God bless Faith and Freedom Network and the parent.

  6. Gary and the parent seem proud of this exchange, but I find it embarrassing.

    Did the parent not get the important answer in the first response from the school? Instead, the parent demanded proof that every administrator was notified via a memo. Who really cares?

    If this parent has been having this exchange with the school for "years," one has to wonder why the child of the parent hasn't yet organized a "Day of Truth" to "test the waters" at the school to find out if there's REALLY any unfair treatment going on. Until then, he/she is just supposing.

    The parent acts belligerant and walks away smug. But, it doesn't appear this exchange has made any change in school policy. It was fair from the start.

    What a fascinating non-story. Thanks, Faith and Freedom!

    I'll be curious to see your report on how the "Day of Truth" goes.

  7. Of course the Christianists must be out of their minds. After all the human anatomy clearly supports gay and lesbian lifestyle! I mean come on! What are you people talking about that homosexuality isn't normal?? The parts FIT together, don't they? The victims are the children who are led to believe this isn't normal, when obviously logic dictates that it's only a matter of time before humans evolve into hermaphrodites!! Isn't that exciting, to know that evidence of the normality of homosexuality is ONLY an evolutionary move away?! Oh I can hardly contain myself! Really, I guess the Christianists have all lost their minds. Good thing they're being put in their place!

  8. Rev. Kent D. Keel12:34 AM, April 15, 2010

    I am a born-again Christian, an ordained minister, a parent of a child in UP Schools and a member of the UP School Board of Directors for the past 10 years. As any 30-year true believer, in every aspect of my life I uphold the principles of Christ.

    I remember addressing this same topic last year. Now, I am reminded of the prophet who did great things for God, but felt that he was the only one doing anything. God had to remind him that GOD had MANY people in the land!

  9. Of course the Christianists must be out of their minds. After all the human anatomy clearly supports gay and lesbian lifestyle!

    Funny - there are many sarcastic Christianists and virtually no Christians - odd that eh?

    And of course since the vast vast vast majority of anything gay couples might do is actually done by opposite gender ones you are ironically right, human anatomy clearly supports the gay, lesbian and straight lifestyles.

    You just can't grasp that though, can you?


Faith and Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.