Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Obama's "Inch By Inch" Homosexual Agenda

It has been said, "Inch by inch, anything is a cinch."

President Obama seems to be operating on that premise in regard to his promises to homosexuals who helped elect him.

Incrementalism. Remember the frog in the kettle.

Senator Ed Murray, Representative Jamie Pederson, and other elected homosexual activists in the Washington State Legislature are following the same game plan as they and their allies continue to re-educate citizens in the State and continue their redefinition of marriage and family.

Homosexual activists in both Washingtons have expressed anger at the lack of progress.

Yesterday, President Obama ticked off a list of things he has done for the homosexuals to a select group of homosexual activists gathered at the White House.

Of note: One of those meeting with the President yesterday was Constance McMillen. Remember her? She was the teenage lesbian who wanted to take her girlfriend to their high school prom a couple of months ago, was denied, filed a lawsuit assisted by the ACLU, received a $30,000 check from "Ellen" and will now be the grand marshal of the NYC gay pride parade this next weekend.

One of the things the President announced to the activists yesterday, was that he, using an existing law, will now be able to give them up to 12-weeks maternity leave from their jobs for the adoption process.

He is working hard to please them, including his "shout out" to families with "two fathers" in his Father's Day Proclamation last weekend.

But they're not happy.

Fred Sainz, VP of Human Rights Campaign, the largest homosexual advocacy organization in Washington DC says, somewhat defending the President, "People wrongly assume that having Democrat majorities in Congress means that your legislative goals will be met. That's not the case."

Lane Hudson, long time homosexual activist who actually interrupted Bill Clinton while he was defending his own administration's handling of homosexual demands says, "The people in the White House have to realize that issues of equality are not controversial."

Two things.

First, keep in mind that because the homosexual agenda is moving slowly doesn't mean there is any loss of commitment on their part to re-engineer the culture. It is the steadfast resistance by people of faith that holds back evil.

Secondly, there is an orchestrated effort to elect, not just liberal or progressive legislators, but homosexual activist legislators, both nationally and in individual states. Tim Gill and other wealthy homosexuals are supporting various political campaigns around the country of candidates who will vote in favor of homosexual "marriage" and its related agenda.

And a third thing. Equality should not be controversial. I agree. Equality should also not be confused with sexual preference. The demands of homosexuals do not equate to the civil rights struggles of African Americans. Legalizing and celebrating perversion must always be controversial. Equality for people of all races must never be.

Be Vigilant. Be Informed. Be Discerning. Be Free. Be Blessed.

_____________
Gary Randall
President
Faith and Freedom

Click here to add these blogs to your email inbox
.

8 comments:

  1. It is not sexual perversion; homosexuality is not a choice. Why would anyone "choose" to be hated and discriminated against? Love is not a bad thing, it is something to be celebrated. How dare you, sir.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Homosexuality, like any behavior IS a choice. To deny this fact is to defer responsibility for your actions onto some great "cosmic accident". Because the results of that choice turn out to be uncomfortable does not make your bad choice something to be celebrated! What is wrong with friendship? Why do some extremists have to pervert it in this way? I for one do not support normalizing your bad choices, and I refuse to be condemned for holding to my belief that marriage should be between one man and one woman, and all other sex is wrong. By the way, I am an attractive, some say sexy, celibate single woman, waiting for the right man. If I can stay pure, anybody can.

    ReplyDelete
  3. People bake dumb choices all the time! My friend used that excuse to say gays couldn't help themself. but I say even drug addicts do stupid things. Its no different.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How does Gary explain all the animals in nature that are homosexual if it's not natural?

    He's been preaching doom and gloom from gay marriage for years. We now have gay marriage in many places with none of the ill effects he predicted.

    ReplyDelete
  5. how dare YOU--is my first @1:22)reaction, to-- which I apologies, as it's your confiction, that is dif from mine!
    I was taught in school that homosexuality is a 'deviant' behaiour, that is labled not 'normal'! From what I understand, in schools today, teachers are to 'teach' otherwise. This does not change anything. With God's ways of one man and one women,and only way to have children, many of us respect God's ways, and reject the life style that unfortunutely, many are caught up in! God help them, and yes, many of us love them unconditually, as we pray for them being enlighted to the Truth!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I grew up in rural America. I knew know gay individuals, I had no gay family members, and I didn't even know what the word gay meant until I was 16. I didn't learn anything about homosexuality in public schools. However, I am a gay man. It is not a "preference" -- it is a biological and physiological response.

    I understand that some people think it is a "choice." Let me be clear --- the biological response is NOT a choice. We can debate whether the acting on the response is a choice....but the underlying biological attraction is NOT a choice.

    Guess what ---- in less than 2 weeks Doe v. Reed will be decided and petition signatures for all petitions will rightly be public information.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks, 4:06
    I hope your comment is added to the law suit. I take it as a thinly veiled threat. More reason why the names should be kept confidential.

    ReplyDelete
  8. People rarely fall away except it be inch by inch.

    Why do people fall into sin?

    Sin seems to gratify. It seems to please, but it's deceptive. It seems like it brings freedom, but it brings one into captivity. It seems that it will bring happiness, but it brings darkness and despair.


    Sin leads to more sins. The appetite of sin is to sin all the more and to hate what is right.

    Sin leads to worse sins. Sin leads others to sin and to sin all the more.

    Sin hurts others as well as self.
    Sin ruins relationships with others. Sin ruins entire families.
    Sin has the power to ruin nations.
    Sin has the power to kill.
    Sin leads to death.
    Sin grieves God.
    Sin separates one from God.
    Sin brings people to reproach.
    Sin puts people on the side of evil. Sin uses people for purposes such that they would not have first wanted to be used for.
    Sin sets the sinner against God who blesses with life and goodness, riches, and honor. Sin saps the life, the anointing, and the gifts of God, such as faith for example, and it happens inch by inch a little at a time. Sin takes away a person's will, a person's strength, and character.
    Sin goes contrary to the blood of Jesus and has eternal consequences. Sin must be overcome and cleansed from one's life if they will live with Jesus where everything is right and good and lasts forever. Sin takes away a person's joy, even their understanding. Sin is a thief and a liar, an enemy of God. Sin will find a person out. All sin will be exposed as sin can never remain hidden forever. Sin will destroy a soul. Sin takes over a man till the Lord takes over a man's life and saves him. Sin brings pain and heartache. Sin should be the enemy of America. It's the enemy of every good nation.

    ReplyDelete

Faith & Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.