Monday, January 19, 2015

Gay "Marriage"---MLK and the Supreme Court

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

The Supreme Court announced Friday they will take up the issue of so-called "gay marriage" this session. Probably in March with a ruling in June.

USA Today reported, "The Supreme Court agreed Friday to resolve the national debate over same-sex marriage once and for all."

Regardless of their ruling, it will not settle the debate "once and for all."

The model of marriage is already settled. The union of a man and a woman is the first human institution created by God for the sustainability of the human race and human fulfillment.

Every major religion and every successful society has affirmed that model for more than 5,000 years.

The Court will supposedly resolve the "threshold question"---whether homosexuals have a "Constitutional" civil right to marry.

In celebration of America's iconic Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr., we wonder how he would feel about the redefinition of marriage.

The answer lies with his closest family members, including his grandfather, a founder of the NAACP.

Seahawks Win--Going To The Super Bowl Again---Russell Wilson gives high praise to God in front of national audience.

The Washington Post reports the Supreme Court's decision by introducing 2 lesbians whom Jeff Bezos' (founder of Amazon also owns the Post) Washington Post says "will be part of history in the same sex battle" attempting to strike some kind of parallel to the actual Civil Rights movement led by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

That argument demands that sexual behavior is equivalent to ethnicity. It is not.

The Post follows the familiar game plan of homosexual advocates and most news media organizations by reporting on one or two individuals with a focus on the hardships they have faced due to bigots and uninformed people blocking their access to "marriage."

The Post highlights the emotions of those who are not eligible to "marry" while ignoring the greater collective issues at stake. And the historic significance of attempting to deconstruct, by redefining marriage, the oldest human social institution.

Human Rights Campaign (America's largest homosexual advocacy organization) president says, "We have reached the moment of truth---the facts are clear, the arguments have been heard by dozens of courts, and now the nine justices of the Supreme Court have an urgent opportunity to guarantee fairness for countless families, once and for all."

Matt Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, says marriage is an institution older than the Constitution. "Marriage is a natural bond that society or religion can only solemnize," he said.

This will be a dominate news story this Spring.

Russell Moore, president of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, says, "As biblical Christians we should pray that the Court will not seek to redefine marriage. Marriage was not created by government action and should not be recreated by government action."

We should also pray the pastors and churches will not be silent on the issue.

As we rightly honor Martin Luther King, Jr. today for his leadership in the true Civil Rights movement, we wonder how he might respond to the homosexual activists who insist their cause is equivalent to his cause.

No one could know better how he would feel then his own family.

A couple of years ago the NAACP released a resolution supporting what they called "marriage equality."

NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous led the association in the decision.

However, the family of Martin Luther King holds a very different view.

MLK's niece Dr. Alveda C. King took considerable issue with the decision and publicly spoke out about it. Many black pastors and leaders agreed.

Alveda said, "Neither my great grandfather, an NAACP founder, my grandfather Dr. Martin Luther King, Sr., an NAACP leader, my father Rev. A.D. Williams King, nor my uncle Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. embraced the homosexual agenda that the current NAACP is attempting to label as a civil rights agenda."

She said, "In the 21st century, the anti-traditional marriage community is in league with the anti-life community, and together with the NAACP and other sympathizers, they are seeking a world where homosexual marriage and abortion will supposedly set captives free."

Day Gardner, founder of the National Black Pro-life Union, agreed with her.

As she sees it, he said, many black people are realizing just how far off the mark the NAACP is with regard to the real issues and the most important problems facing the black community.

Gardner says, "It is appalling that this one time super hero 'civil rights' organization supports the breakdown of traditional marriage and the ruthless killing of our unborn children ---as a civil right."

And it isn't only a "few" conservative black leaders who believe that marriage is between one man and one woman.

In California, during Proposition 8, polls showed that 70% of blacks opposed "same-sex marriage."

Based on the testimony of his own family, it is apparent that MLK would cheer on those Marching for Life across the nation, but would weep over those who seek to use the authentic Civil Rights Movement to normalize and legitimize their sexual behavior, and enshrine it into law as a "civil right" while attempting to redefine the oldest social institution known to the human race.

He would certainly encourage the Supreme Court to defend natural marriage.

It was MLK himself who once said, "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about the things that matter."

Alveda is right. The anti-marriage folks are indeed in league with the anti-life folks.

Rather than a common goal of equality, I believe these movements are driven by a rebellion against Nature and Nature's God---the Creator.

God help us not to be silent about such matters.

Be Vigilant. Be Informed. Be Prayerful. Be Bold. Be Blessed.


  1. You conveniently leave out Coretta Scott King's numerous statements over the years that "all forms of bigotry and discrimination are equally wrong and should be opposed by right-thinking Americans everywhere" Here's an excerpt from March 31, 1998 Reuters story:

    "Coretta Scott King, speaking four days before the 30th anniversary of her husband’s assassination, said Tuesday the civil rights leader’s memory demanded a strong stand for gay and lesbian rights. “I still hear people say that I should not be talking about the rights of lesbian and gay people and I should stick to the issue of racial justice,” she said. “But I hasten to remind them that Martin Luther King Jr. said, ‘Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.'” “I appeal to everyone who believes in Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream to make room at the table of brother- and sisterhood for lesbian and gay people,” she said."

    And never forget that Bayard Rustin, an out gay man, was MLK, Jr's "organizing genius", as Henry Louis Gates, Jr. calls him.

    1. Coretta Scott King certainly has a right to express her views, but when we attempt to resurrect Martin Luther King Jr. and draw a conclusion that he supported Gay and Lesbian Marriage because he had fellowship with a gay man who joined him in supporting Racial Justice we are missing the mark. A gay or lesbian may love a person of similar thinking and still not have the relationship God intended for marriage. It's similar to trying to make two minuses be equal to a plus. It just doesn't work that way. For centuries man and woman have tried to negate what God originally planned and even though it evolves into a court decision of approval, it doesn't equate to a Godly submission. Vancouver, Washington - RB

  2. Homosexuals have always had the same rights as everyone else. Granting them marriage licenses to marry those of same sex is ridiculous. It's an abomination.

    The supreme court should go back and take a very close look at what was done unconstitutionally against the protection of marriage, marriage as defined by God, and historically accepted as such in the United States of America, and then declare anything other than marriage as defined by God in the scriptures, as unconstitutional, for how can anything that is so morally wrong ever rightfully be considered a constitutional right, especially as it serves no moral good for the nation whatsoever, and is the cause of so much trouble.

    They should let the peace of God rule in their heart. The gay agenda is a disturbance to the peace of this nation.

    Right now I have no confidence in the highest court of the land. They have a long way to go to restore the confidence of the people. There's a lot of restoration that needs to be done. There are a lot of wrongs that need to be fixed. They've been going the wrong way for a long time.

    It seem they want us all to be a partaker of their sins. They want our corruption. They must want us to loose our blessing from God. It seems they want us to become cursed children.

  3. I always thought M.L.K. was for whoever's rights, the rights of all people, but only pertaining to what rights really are, not what some people think of as rights today.

  4. I think they got the idea correct about rights and what they are when they talked about them as being about life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

    The gay agenda fails on all three counts.

  5. It's mind boggling today. Why is it that a man's rights today are about being entertained with pornography on a computer in a public library? Crazy.
    Why should my tax money be paying for that?

    Whoever it was that had a dream for public libraries....I don't think they had that in mind. I think we've gone a long ways away from many good original dreams.

  6. The gay agenda?....Not MLK's dream. Is there anything the gay agenda will not pervert or corrupt?


Faith and Freedom welcomes your comment posts. Remember, keep it short, keep it on message and relevant, and identify your town.